BIBLIOGRAFIA
Ahmadi F, McLoughlin IV, Chauhan S, Ter-Haar G., Bio-effects and safety of low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasonic exposure, Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2012 Apr;108(3):119-38.
Apfel R. E. and Holland C. K. Gauging the likelyhood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., 1991; 17 (2): 179-185.
Artho P.A.,. Thyne J.G, Warring B.P., Willis C.D., Brismée J.-M., Latman N.S., A calibration study of therapeutic ultrasound units, Phys. Ther. 82 (3) (2002) 257–263.
Asher, B Safety and efficacy of UltraShape Contour I treatments to improve the appearance of body Contours: multiple treatments in shorter intervals, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 2010, 30(2) 217–224.
Baker, Robertson, Duck, A review of therapeutic ultrasound; biophysical effects. Physical therapy, vol 81, 7, 1351-1358, 2001. Barnett SB (1980) The effect of ultrasonic irradiation on the structural integrity of the inner ear labyrinth. Acta Otolaryngol 89: 424-432.
Barnett SB, Walsh DA, Angles JA (1990) Novel approach to evaluate the interaction of pulsed ultrasound with embryonic development. Ultrasonics 28: 166-170.
Barnett, Free radical production: its biological consequences, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 24 (Suppl. 1) (1998) S29–S34.
Barth G, Wachsmann F: Biological effects of ultrasonic therapy. Stuttgart, Congress Bericht, Ter Erlanger Ulyruschall-Tagung, 1949, pp 162-205.
Bombalska A., Mularczyk-Oliwa M., Kwasny M., Wlodarski M., Kaliszewski M., Kopczynskia K., Szpakowska M. and Trafny E.A.. Classification of the biological material with use of FTIR spectroscopy and statistical analysis, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 78 (2011), pp. 1221–1226.
Brown S.A., Greenbaum L., Shtukmaster S., Zadok Y., Ben-Ezra S., Kushkuley L. Characterization of non thermal focused ultrasound for non invasive selective fat cell disruption (lysis): technical and preclinical assessment, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 124, 1 (2009).
Busse, J.W 2004 Therapeutic ultrasound and fracture healing: a survey of beliefs and practices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85(10):1653-6. Canada, 1989,
Guidelines for the safe use of ultrasound: part I-Medical and paramedical Applications (excerpt from safety code 23, 1989) Health Canada www.hc-sc.gc.ca 191Canada, 2010, Radiation Emitting Devices Act, Canadian Minister of Justice. CEI 62-39 (1998)
Apparecchi elettrici per uso estetico. Guida generale per la sicurezza. Conti L., Grimaldi P., Udroiu I., Bedini A., Giliberti C., Giuliani L., Palomba R., Congiu Castellano A., “Effects induced in cells by ultrasound revealed by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy”, Vibrational Spectroscopy 52 (2010) 79–84.
Crisci AR, Ferreira AL (2002) Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates the regeneration of the sciatic nerve after neurotomy in rats. Ultrasound Med Biol 28: 1335-1341.
da Cunha A, Parizotto NA, Vidal BC (2001) The effect of therapeutic ultrasound on repair of the achilles tendon (tendo calcaneus) of the rat. Ultrasound Med Biol 27: 1691-169.
Dalecki D (2004) Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 6: 229-248.
Daniel D.M., Rupert R.L., Calibration and electrical safety status of therapeutic ultrasound used by chiropractic physicians, J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 26 (3) (2003) 171–175.
Di Giambattista L., Grimaldi P., Udroiu I., Pozzi D., Cinque G., Frogley M.D., Bedini A., Giliberti C., Palomba R., Giuliani L., Buogo S., Giansanti A. and Congiu Castellano A. ”The Ultrasound effects on non tumoral cell line at 1 MHz therapeutic frequency” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 279 (2011).
Direttiva 2004/108/CE del Parlamento Europeo e del Consiglio del 15 dicembre 2004 concernente il ravvicinamento delle legislazioni degli Stati membri relative alla compatibilità elettromagnetica eche abroga la direttiva 89/336/CEE. Direttiva 2006/95/CE del Parlamento Europeo e del Consiglio del 12 dicembre 2006 concernente il ravvicinamento delle legislazioni degli Stati membri relative al materiale elettrico destinato ad essere adoperato entro taluni limiti di tensione.
Direttiva Europea 93/42, European Communities, 1993, Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices. Off. J. Eur. Communities 169, 12.7.1993.
Duck FA, Medical and non-medical protection standards for ultrasound and infrasound, Progress in Biophysics and molecular biology 93 (2007) 176-191.
Dyson M. (1985), “Therapeutic Applications of Ultrasound”, Ch. 11 in “Biological Effects of Ultrasound”, W.L. Nyborg and M.C. Ziskin (eds), Churchill Livingstone. Dyson M. Mechanisms involved in therapeutic ultrasound. Physioterapy 1987; 73:116-192
Edwards MJ, Walsh DA, Li Z (1997) Hyperthermia, teratogenesis and the heat shock response in mammalian embryos in culture. Int J Dev Biol 41: 345-358.
EHC, Environmental Health Criteria 22, 1982, Ultrasound. FDA, 1997, Information for manufacturers seeking marketing clearance of diagnostic ultrasound systems and transducers. Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, Ear, Nose, Throat and Radiological Devices: Office of Device Evaluation. US Department of Health and Human Services: Food and Drug Administration. /www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/ulstran.pdf. FDA, 2006, Performance standards for sonic, infrasonic, and ultrasonic radiation emitting products. Food and Drug Administration. Available at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFRCFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=1-5 &showFR=1. Accessed September 22, 2006 Fenech M. The in vitro micronucleus tecnique. Mutation Research 455 (2000) 81-95.
Ferrari C.B., Andrade, JC Adamowski, RRJ Guirro Evaluation of therapeutic ultrasound equipments performance, Ultrasonics 50 (2010) 704-709.
Forbes MM, Steinberg RL, O’Brien WD Jr. Frequency-dependent evaluation of the role of definity in producing sonoporation of Chinese hamster ovary cells, J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Jan;30(1):61-9.
Frieder SJ, Weisberg B, Fleming B, et al. A pilot study: the therapeutic effect of ultrasound following partial rupture of Achilles tendon in male rats. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1988;10:39–46.
Fuciarelli A.F., Sisk E. C., Ronald M. T. and Miller D. L. “Induction of base damage in DNA solutions by ultrasonic cavitation” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 1995; 18 (2): 231-238.
Fyfe M., Bullock M. Acoustic output from therapeutic ultrasound units, The Australian Journal of Physioterapy , vol 32 n.1 1986, 13-16.
Fyfe MC, Parnell SM. The importance of measurement of effective transducers radiating area in the testing and calibration of ‘‘therapeutic’’ ultrasonic instruments. Health Phys. 1982;43:377–381.
Gadsden E, Aguilar MT, Smoller BR, Jewell ML, Evaluation of a novel high-intensity focused ultrasound device for ablating subcutaneous adipose tissue for noninvasive body contouring: safety studies in human volunteers. Aesthet Surg J. 2011 May;31(4):401-10.
Gann N. Ultrasound: current concepts. Clin Manage 1991; 11:64-9. Gledhill M. Survey of physiotherapy ultrasound equipment calibrations, National Radiation Laboratory (New Zealand) Report NRL, 1996/4. 1996.
Grimaldi P. Di Giambattista L, Giordani S., Udroiu I, Pozzi D., Gaudenzi S., Bedini A., Giliberti C., Palomba R., Congiu Castellano A. Ultrasound-mediated structural changes in cells revealed by FTIR spectroscopy: a contribution to the optimization of gene and drug delivery, Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2011 Dec 15;84(1):74-85.
Guiot C., Spagnolo R. Ultrasuoni in Medicina, Principi fisici e applicazioni, UTET, 2010. Guirro R.J., Serrão F., Elias D., Bucalon A.J., Calibration of therapeutic ultrasound equipment, Physiotherapy 83 (8) (1997) 419–422.
Guirro, R. S Britshcy Dos Santos Evalujation of the acoustic intensity of the new ultrasound therapy equipment, Ultrasonics 39 (2002) 553-557.
Guzmán H. R, Nguyen D.X., McNamara A. J., Prausnitz M.R., Equilibrium loading cells with macromolecules by ultrasound: effect of molecular size and acoustic energy, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences vol. 91, n.7 july 2002.
Guzman H. R., Nguyen D. X., Khan S., and Prausnitza M. R., Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. II. Heterogeneous effects on cells, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110 (1), July 2001.
Hallow DM, Mahajan AD, McCutchen TE, Prausnitz MR. Measurement and correlation of acoustic cavitation with cellular bioeffects, Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006 Jul; 32(7):1111-22.
Hekkenberg R.T. Characterising ultrasonic physiotherapy systems by performance and safety now internationally agreed Ultrasonics 36 (1998) 713-720.
Hekkenberg, R T, Reibold, R and Zeqiri, B (1994). ‘Development of standard measurement methods for essential properties of ultrasonic therapy equipment’, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 20, 1, 83-98.
Hill C.R., ter Haar G., Ultrasound in non-ionizing radiation protection, in: M.J. Suess (Ed.) WHO Regional Publications,European Series No. 10, WHO, Copenhagen, 1981. Huang YM, Sun SQ, Zhao J, Yu X and Zhong W. Effects of free radicals on the molecular fluidity and structure of the membrane. RBS Biorheology, 1995; 2 (2): 321-21.
Humphrey V. F. 2007. Ultrasound and matter – Physical interaction. Biophys. Mol. Bio. 93: 195-211. Hynynen and Mc Dannold N. MRI guided and monitored focused ultrasound thermal ablation methods: a review of progress. Int J of Hypertherm. 2004; 20: 725-737.
Hynynen K., Watmough D.J. and Mallard J.R. (1981), “The Effects of Some Physical Factors on the Production of Hyperthermia by Ultrasound in Neoplastic Tissues”, Radiat. Environ. Biophys., Vol. 19, pp. 215-226.
Hynynen K. Ultrasound for drug and gene delivery to the brain. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008;60:1209–1217. IEC 150 (1995) (International Electrotechnical Commission (1995). ’Physiotherapy systems – Performance requirements and methods of measurement in the frequency range 0.5 to 5 MHz’, IEC, draft revision of publication 150, IEC, Geneva.
IEC 61161-2007 Ultrasuoni – Misure di potenza – Bilanci della forza di radiazione e requisiti di prestazione International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland. IEC 61689-2009- Ultrasuoni- Sistemi per fisioterapia-specifiche di campo e metodo di misura nel campo delle frequenze comprese tra 0,5 MHz e 5 MHz.IEC, 2001, IEC 60601 part 2–5: Medical Electrical Equipment: Particular Requirements for the Safety of Ultrasound Physiotherapy Equipment. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva. IEC, 2001b. IEC 60601 part 2–37: Medical Electrical Equipment: Particular Requirements for the Safety of Ultrasound Diagnostic and Monitoring Equipment 2001 and Amendment 1, 2005.
International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva. IPSM, 1988, Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine, Report 58: ‘Guidelines for the routine performance checking of medical ultrasound equipment’, edited by R E Richardson, IPSM,York. Ishikawa N.M., Alvarenga A.V., Paes L.F.C., Pereira W.C.A., Machado J.C., Análise do desempenho de equipamentos de ultra-som para fisioterapia, operando nacidade do Rio de Janeiro, conforme a norma NBR/IEC 1689 da ABNT, Rev. Bras. Fisioter. 6 (2) (2002) 63–69.
Jamin N., Miller L., Moncuit J., Fridman W.-H., Dumas P., Teillaud J.-L., “ chemical heterogeneity in cell death: combined synchrotron IR and fluorescence microscopy studies of single apoptotic and necrotic cells”, Biopolymers (Biospectroscopy), 2003, 72: 366-373.
Johns L.D., Straub S.J., Howard S.M., Analysis of effective radiating area, power, intensity, and field characteristics of ultrasound transducers, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 88 (1) (2007) 124–129.
Johns,. Straub, Howard Variability in Effective Radiating Area and Output, Power of New Ultrasound Transducers at 3 MHz, Journal of Athletic Training 2007;42(1):22–28.
Karshafian R, Bevan PD, Williams R, Samac S, Burns PN. Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability, Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 May;35(5):847-60.
Karshafian R, Samac S, Bevan PD, Burns PN. Microbubble mediated sonoporation of cells in suspension: clonogenic viability and influence of molecular size on uptake. Ultrasonics. 2010 Jun;50(7):691-7.
Kim B.S., Cho M. and Kim H.J. Mutat. Res., Statistical analysis of in vivo rodent micronucleus assay 469 (2000), pp. 233–241. Kimmel E (2006) Cavitation bioeffects. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 34:105–161.
Kodama T., Hamblin M. R., and Doukas A. G. Cytoplasmic Molecular Delivery with Shock Waves: Importance of Impulse Biophysical Journal Volume 79 October 2000, 1821–1832.
Kolar J., Babickj, A., Kaslova, J., & Kasi, J. (1965) The effect of ultrasound on the mineral metabolism of bones.] Travmatol. protezinov., 26(8): 43-51.
Krasovitski B.,Frenkel V.,Shoham S, Kimmel E.,Intramembrane cavitaion as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 22;108(8):3258-63.
Langton N.H., Vaugan P. “Cavitation and the ultrasonic degradation of high polymers” Brit.J.Appl.Phys., 1962; 13: 478-482.
Lazar DA, Curra FP, Mohr B, McNutt LD, Kliot M, Mourad PD (2001) Acceleration of recovery after injury to the peripheral nervous system using ultrasound and other therapeutic modalities. Neurosurg Clin N Am 12: 353-357.
Lehmann J.F. and de Lateur B.J. (1982), in “Therapeutic Heat and Cold”, Ch. 10, J.F. Lehmann, (Ed.), Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore. Lehmann JF. Clinical evaluation of a new approach in the treatment of contracture associated with hip fracture after internal fixation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1961;42:95.
Leighton TG (1997) The Acoustic Bubble (Academic, London, San Diego), pp 312–426. Lele P.P. (1979), “Safety and Potential Hazards in the Current Applications of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology”, Ultrasound in Med. and Biol., Vol. 5, pp. 307-320.8.
Lin S.-Y., Wei Y.-S., Li M.-J. and Wang S.-L., Effect of ethanol or/and captopril on the secondary structure of human serum albumin before and after protein binding, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 57 (2004) 457–464.
Marchioni C, Riccardi E, Spinelli S, Dell’Unto F, Grimaldi P, Bedini A, Giliberti C, Giuliani L, Palomba R, Congiu Castellano A. Structural changes induced in proteins by therapeutic ultrasounds, Ultrasonics. 2009 Jun; 49 (6-7): 569-76.
Miller M. W., Brayman A. A. “Biological effect of ultrasound. The perceived safety of diagnostic ultrasound within the context of ultrasound biophysics: a personal perspective” Echocardiography: A Jrnl. Of CV Ultrasound and Allied Tech.,1997, 14 (6): 615-627.
Miller DL, Thomas RM. Ultrasonic gas body activation in elodea leaves and the mechanical index. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993; 19:343–351.
Miller M. W., Miller D. L. and Brayman A. A. “A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective” Ultrasound in Med. and Biol., 1996, 22 (9): 1131-1154.
Milowska K., Gabryelak T. “Reactive oxygen species and DNA damage after ultrasound exposure” Biomol. Eng., 2007; 24: 263-267.
Ministero della Salute, Sicurezza ed efficacia delle apparecchiature in riabilitazione, Quaderni del Ministero della Salute, n.8, marzo-aprile, 2011. Moreno-Moraga J., Valero-Alte ́ s T., Martı ́nez Riquelme A., Isarria-Marcosy M.I., and J. Royo de la Torre Body Contouring by Non-Invasive Transdermal Focused Ultrasound, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 39:315–323 (2007).
Mourad PD, Lazar DA, Curra FP, Mohr BC, Andrus KC, Avellino AM, McNutt LD, Crum LA, Kliot M (2001) Ultrasound accelerates functional recovery after peripheral nerve damage. Neurosurgery 48: 1136-1140.
NCRP Report No. 74 (1983), “Biological Effects of Ultrasound: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications”, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20814, issued December 30. Oakley E.M. (1978), “Dangers and Contraindications of Therapeutic Ultrasound”, Physiotherapy, Vol. 64, p. 174.
O’Brien WD, Jr. (2007) Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 93:212–255.
Ohhashi Y., Kihara M., Naiki H., Goto Y. ”Ultrasonication-induced amyloid fibril formation of ß2 –microglobulin” J. Biol. Chem., 2005; 280: 32843-32848.
Ohl CD, Arora M, Ikink R, de Jong N, Versluis M, Delius M, Lohse D. Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles. Biophys J 2006;91: 4285–4295.
Okada K., Kudo N., Niwa K., Yamamoto K., “A basic study of sonoporation with microbubble exposed to pulsed ultrasound” J. Med. Ultrasonics, 2005, 32: 3-11.
Paik NJ, Cho SH, Han TR (2002) Ultrasound therapy facilitates the recovery of acute pressure-induced conduction block of the median nerve in rabbits. Muscle Nerve 26: 356-361.
Payton, Lamb and Kasey (1975), “Effects of Therapeutic Ultrasound on Bone Marrow in Dogs”, Phys. Ther., 55:270-275.
Pepe J., Rincon M., Wu Junru “Experimental comparison of sonoporation and electroporation in cell transfection application” Acoustics Research Letters Online, 2004; 5 (2): 62-67.
Perkins, M A (1989). ‘A versatile force balance for ultrasound power measurement‘, Physics in Medicine and Biology, 34, 11, 1645-51.
Plaja, J. 2003. Analgesia por Medios Físicos, Editorial Mc Graw-Hill. Pozzi D, Fattibene P, Viscomi D, Di Giambattista L, Grimaldi P, Udroiu I, Bedini A, Giliberti C, Palomba R, Congiu Castellano A., Use of EPR and FTIR to detect biological effects of ultrasound and microbubbles on a fibroblast cell line. Eur Biophys J. 2011, Vol. 40, No 10, pp. 1115-1120.
Preston, R.C. Output measurements for medical ultrasound, Springer Verlag, 1991. Pye S, C. Milford, C. 1994. The Performance of Ultrasound Physiotherapy machines in Lothian, Scotland. Ultrasound Med. Biol.20 (4): 347-359.
Pye S. Ultrasound therapy equipment-does it perform? Physioterapy, January 1996, vol. 82, n.1, 39-44.
Reid D.C. (1981), “Possible Contraindications and Precautions Associated with Ultrasound Therapy”, In: A. Mortimer, N. Lee (eds.), Proceedings of International Symposium on Therapeutic Ultrasound, Canadian Physiotherapy Association. Repacholi, M.H. & Benwell, D.A. (1979) Using surveys of ultrasound therapy devices to draft performance standards. Health Phys., 36: 679-686.
Riesz, P., Kondo, T., 1992. “Free radical formation induced by ultrasound and its biological implications”. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 13, 247–270.
Rivest M, Quirion-de Girardi C, Seaborne D, et al. Evaluation of therapeutic ultrasound devices: performance stability over 44 weeks of clinical use. Physiother Can 1987;39:77–86. Robertson, V., 2002. Dosage and treatment response in randomised clinical trials of therapeutic ultrasound. Physical Ther. Sport 3,124–133.
Robertson V., Therapeutic Ultrasound at 1 MHz, Invited Commentary, Physical Therapy, vol. 88 number 1, 2008. Schabrun, Walzer, Chipchase, How accurate are therapeutic ultrasound machines? Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal, Volume 26, 2008.
Schlicher RK, Radhakrishna H, Tolentino TP, Apkarian RP, Zarnitsyn V, Prausnitz MR. Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006;32:915–924.
Shaw, Hodnett, Calibration and measurement issues for therapeutic ultrasound, Ultrasonics 48 (2008) 234–252.
Sicurezza e Igiene del Lavoro, Raccolta Normativa a cura della Te.Si.A S.r.l., anno 2000 Speed C.A. Review, Therapeutic Ultrasound in soft tissue, Rheumatology 2001; 40:1331-1336
Teitelbaum, S. A., Burns J, Kubota J., Matsuda H., Otto M., Shirakabe Y., Suzuki Y., Brown S. Noninvasive Body Contouring by Focused Ultrasound: Safety and Efficacy of the Contour I Device in a Multicenter, Controlled, Clinical Study, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, September 1, 2007 ter Haar G., Therapeutic applications of ultrasound, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 93 (2007) 111–129.
Wells PNT: Biomedical Ultrasonics. New York, Academic Press, Inc, 1977. Wessling KC, DeVane DA, Hylton CR. Effects of static stretch versus static stretch and ultrasound combined on triceps surae muscle extensibility in healthy women. Phys Ther. 1987;67:674–679.
WHO, International Programme on Chemical Safety, Environmental Health Criteria, 22, 1982. Wu J. Shear stress in cells generated by ultrasound. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2007;93:363–373.
Zarnitsyn V., Rostad C.A., Prausnitz M.R., Modeling transmembrane transport through cell membrane wounds created by acoustic cavitation, Biophysical Journal 95, 4124–4138, 2008.
Zhou Y., Cui J, Deng C.X., Dynamics of sonoporation correlated with acoustic cavitation activities, Biophysical Journal: Biophysical Letters 94, L51-L53, 2008.
Ziskin M, McDiarmid T, Michlovitz S. Therapeutic ultrasound. In: Michlovitz S. ed Thermal agents in rehabilitation. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis, 1990
2019
Massari L et al. Biophysical stimulation of bone and cartilage: state of the art and future perspectives. Int Orthop. 2019 Mar;43(3):539-551.
2018
Toschon M et al. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields and platelet rich plasma in preventing osteoclastogenesis in an in vitro model of osteolysis. J Cell Physiol. 2018 Mar;233(3):2645-2656.
2017
Massari L et al. Focus Group Ortopedia. Impiego clinico della stimolazione elettrica in ortopedia e traumatologia. The use of electrical stimulation in traumatology and orthopaedic practice. Giornale Italiano di Ortopedia e Traumatologia. 2017;43:105-106
Cadossi R et al. Physical Dynamics: The Base for the Development of Biophysical Treatments. In: Marko Markov, ed. Dosimetry in Bioelectromagnetics. CRC Press 2017;(4):87-100.
2015
Moretti B. Biofisica Ortopedica e traumatologica nella pratica clinica. Edizioni CIC, 2015 Nov.
Cadossi R et al.Physical Regulation in Cartilage and Bone Repair. In: Marko S. Markov, ed. Electromagnetic Fields in Biology and Medicine. CRC Press. 2015;(16):253-372.
2014
Cadossi M et al. Clinical Application of Biophysical Stimulation on Bone in Europe. In: Paul J. Rosch, ed. Bioelectromagnetic and Subtle Energy Medicine, Second Edition. CRC Press. 2014;(24):267-278.
Ongaro A et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulate osteogenic differentiation in human bone marrow and adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2014 Spet;35(6):426-36.
2013
Cadossi R et al. Trattamenti di supporto: campi elettromagnetici. Adjuvant treatments: electromagnetic fields. GIO 2013 Ago;39(Suppl1):155-160.
2012
Fassina L et al. Electromagnetic stimulation to optimize the bone regeneration capacity of gelatin-based cryogels. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2012;25(1):165-174.
Cadossi M et al. Utilizzo della stimolazione biofisica nel tessuto osseo osteoporotico. AITOG OGGI. 2012 Ott/Nov;1-8.
Esposito M et al. Differentiation of human osteoprogenitor cells increases after treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields. In Vivo. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(2):299-304.
Martinelli N et al. Pseudarthrosis after percutaneous distal osteotomy in hallux valgus surgery: a case report. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;102(1):78-82.
2011
Massari L et al. Stimolazione elettrica dell’osteogenesi: efficacia e tecnologie a confronto. GIOT, Dic 2011;37:1-8.
Massari L. Algorithm for employing physical forces in metabolic bone diseases Aging Clin Exp Res 2011;23 (Suppl2):52-53.
2010
Sollazzo V et al. Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Human Osteoblastlike Cells (MG-63): A Pilot Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2260–2277.
Cebrian JL et al.Comparative study of the use of electromagnetic fields in patients with pseudoarthrosis of tibia treated by intramedullary nailing. International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 2010;34:437-440.
2009
Massari M et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields and low intensity pulsed ultrasound in bone tissue. Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism. 009; 6(2):149-154.
2007
Cadossi R et al. Fattori fisici di stimolazione ossea. Physical forces in bone stimulation. G.I.O.T. 2007;33(Suppl1):S255-S261.
2005
De Mattei M et al. Changes in polyamines, c-myc and c-fos gene expression in osteoblast-like cells exposed to pulsed electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005;26(3):207-214.
Cadossi R et al. Electric and magnetic stimulation of bone repair: review of the European experience. In: Roy K. Aaron, Mark E. Bolander, editors. Symposium of Physical Regulation of Skeletal Repair. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Rosemont, Illinois. 2005;37-51.
Luna Gonzalez F et al. Pulsed electromagnetic stimulation of regenerate bone in lengthening procedures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005 Oct;71(5):571-576.
2004
Aaron RK et al. Stimulation of growth factor synthesis by electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(419):30-37. Review.
1998
“Consensus Conferenceî Impiego della Stimolazione Elettrica e Magnetica in Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Italian Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 1998;24(1):13-31.
1994
Capanna R et al. Effect of electromagnetic fields on patients undergoing massive bone graft following bone tumor resection. A double blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;(306):213-221.
1993
Cane V et al. Pulsed magnetic fields improve osteoblast activity during the repair of an experimental osseous defect. J Orthop Res. 1993;11(5):664-670.
Mammi GI et al. The electrical stimulation of tibial osteotomies. Double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(288):246-253.
1991
Traina GC et al. Effect of electromagnetic stimulation on patients suffering from non-union. A retrospective study with a control group. J of Bioelectricity.1991;10:101-117.
1988
Borsalino G et al. Electrical stimulation of human femoral intertrochanteric osteotomies. Double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(237):256-263.
1986
Dal Monte A et al. Treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis and acquired non-union with pulsing electromagnetic fields (PEMFS). Orthop Trans J Bone Joint Surg. 1986;10(3):452.
Fontanesi G, Traina GC, Giancecchi F, Tartaglia I, Rotini R, Virgili B, Cadossi R, Ceccherelli G, Marino AA. La lenta evoluzione del processo riparativo di una frattura può essere prevenuta? GIOT. 1986;389-404.
1983
Fontanesi G et al. Treatment of delayed union and pseudarthrosis by low frequency pulsing electromagnetic stimulation. Study of 35 cases. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1983 Sep;9(3):305-318.
1982
Bassett CA et al. Pulsing electromagnetic field treatment in ununited fractures and failed arthrodeses. JAMA. 1982;247(5):623-628.